I'm really hoping that the K&N system can produce an additional 18hp....but I keep thinking at what cost?? I remember seeing tons of dyno graphs from multiple cold air intake companies for the SUV and Pickup market, especially when these things took off 7 to 8 years ago. What was interesting is many dyno charts saw a loss of power at 2000 rpm, and a gain at 4800 rpm for example. In reality, how many SUV's and 4wd trucks actually stay at those upper rpms for more than a few seconds? Most SUVs and trucks spend the majority of their time at the 2000 rpm range. Many of the all steel kits would get very badly heat soaked when in stop and go driving and give very sluggish performance until cooled off (ie, highway speeds).
Here's a couple of questions maybe some experts on the forum can answer for me.
How would it be best to measure the performance gain of something like this using a dyno...average power gain under a specific rpm range (for a Viper, maybe between 3000 and 6000 rpm)? Peak numbers can be munipulated so easy on a dyno, I don't think it's fair to claim a performance increase just because you picked one narrow range on a dyno curve. You may have lost a lot more outside that specific point on the curve (hopefully not).
Would a better test be a rolling start from 20 mph in second gear to 120 mph timed run? I would think this would give better real world results in proving if my is Viper faster with the K&N or not.
Last question, I know that many of our computer systems "self learn" for optimum performance. Is there a possibility that the computer will allow a K&N system (or any other type of cold air kit) to actually make more power than stock at first, but then after re-adjusting the air flows, density, etc start to end up back to stock hp levels after 100 to 200 miles of driving? In other words, if the stock system supplies the needed cfm 98% of the time, would changing the cfm flow rate at specific rpms fool the computer into making additional hp for a short time until it re-learns the flow patterns? (I hope this makes sense)
I really hope the K&N deal is for real...there are just so few products for the GEN IV motors. It's one thing to spend the money and not get any performance improvement (I think we've all done that with one product or another), but totally unacceptable to actually lose performance. I just want to have more facts and proof before I take the plunge.
Cheers,
George