andrew8896
Enthusiast
Hemotox, I see your point, and I agree; the new coupe is a nice car, and like you said its just not spectacular (you didnt have to use the F-word on me though!! hahahha )
Is that like saying "your kid is good looking in person but is not in pictures"??? Just my 2 cents...Does this forum now seem more complete? I think so! Its a welcome addition to this forum that will have the Gen II guys coming over here much more often. I went to the Chicago Autoshow 2005 this afternoon and took pics of the GTS errr SRT Coupe and now truly believe that the car very Beautiful but it is NOT photogenic. The SRT Coupe in person is TRULY BREATHTAKING AND GORGEOUS!! But at every angle I tried to snap a pic, the camera couldn't properly interpret the beauty and appreciation of the shot I was taking. The curves were everywhere and yet I had great difficulty. I now know what everyone who went to the Autoshow and VOI8 saw! The car looks great! I hope to have photos from today's Autoshow up before the end of the weekend.
Jay K.
I wouldn't mind the SRT-10 if it wasn't for it's bland styling and corvette wheels and hood. There we are even...Yeah seriously. To each his own on that one. The Gen I and II are great cars, loved mine, but not for second do I think that they look better than the SRT.
Or maybe it is my prior ownership that evokes those feelings? My buddies see a great car. I see a poorly designed hood, cheap interior and rattling dash and brakes that recall downtown trafficking in the U-Haul.
Being that there are 8x the number of Gen I/II cars that there are SRT's I am sure that I am about to be called a heretic.
The thing is, most SRT owners, owned or had the option to buy GEN I or II, and would have saved money by doing so, but chose to go for the better car..
The thing is, most SRT owners, owned or had the option to buy GEN I or II, and would have saved money by doing so, but chose to go for the better car..
I guess this proves the old PT Barnum saying
"vipah", Quote:
"Yes an elephant like you should know about a circus! LMAO"
GOOD ONE SRT10
ANDY:
"You can say different car, but not better car. Let's not get delusional here."
I didn't say prettier, I said better, much better in every category.. <font color="red"> CASE CLOSED </font>
I love the Gen I and II cars, but the Gen III is a much, much BETTER car. It isn't really even close.
There are several guys on here who have moved up to the newer car, not one of them has claimed to be dissappointed. Without exception, every post made by previous Gen I or II owners claim the Gen III is a much better car.
I understand that if you are the owner of a Gen I or II you are very proud, rightfully so. However, you can be proud without claiming that is is an irrefutable fact and the opinion of the entire world that your car is superior to the newer one. This type of comment smells a bit like envy.
Now, those of you who claim to have never heard anyone prefer the Gen III....now you have.
Dirk