you need to ask that question again now that the 918 ran a 6:57 I believe on race only tires!What tires was the ACR X on again?
you need to ask that question again now that the 918 ran a 6:57 I believe on race only tires!What tires was the ACR X on again?
you need to ask that question again now that the 918 ran a 6:57 I believe on race only tires!
Ahhhh no, PS2s
Yes. At a min they are at least as good as the tires the acr ran with. But most likely improved quite a bit. It's been in every article I've read. Not sure why people keep quoting ps2...Ahhhh, no. Specifically engineered Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2. Which you can't even buy yet.
Ahhhh, no. Specifically engineered Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2. Which you can't even buy yet.
Oh good Lord. When the ACR ran on tires better than anyone else, we still were jumping for joy that it had the ring record. They have an newer version of the tire we used. It still beat the ACR X...
That wasn't the point. The point was it is on a new version of the Sport Cups, not the PS2s, which are not Sport Cups of any kind. Just clarifying. The PS2s are a completely different tire.
BTW these tires were first used on the AMG Black cars, now the Porsches and followed by Ferrari
For some reason, the article I read said PS2s but I stand corrected. The thing is, the new breed of supercars have a lot going for them and it is going to require some technology to make the viper keep up. I don't know where I stand on it myself. I want the viper to be an old school brute just as much as I want it to be the fastest. We can't really have both in this day and age. Cars with less power can outrun us in a straight line because of awd, a better traction control, PDK transmissions and so forth. Is it enough that the viper continue to be a giant V-10 and get a PDK and some of these other advantages that would put us in the running again? Would it still be enough of a viper?
Well judging by the 112 MPH trap speed of the C7 I don't think anyone has to worry about them.
21. | Chevrolet Corvette Stingray | 1:38.28 | 132MPH | '14 | 461HP | |
22. | Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 | 1:38.70 | 131MPH | '08 | 647HP |
The C7 typically puts down 117MPH traps, but that's not the scary part. The fact that the C7 has 285 size rears and beat an 08' ZR1 including it's average speed, is what's really scary.
21.
Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
1:38.28
132MPH
'14
461HP
22.
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1
1:38.70
131MPH
'08
647HP
The Z0x will be mean. Maybe even take down the TA. The ACR needs to be revolutionary in aero and HP.
Boy it sure seems like dooms day on these gen V forums. Have faith guys. You can bet SRT is watching the c7 developments very closely. From what I've read, there really isn't any plans for a zr1 in the foreseeable future, with the new z07 slated to be the new top vette. Let's all stay calm, the gen v is only on its 2nd year of production after coming back from nothing. SRT doesn't have the same budget or amount of resources that GM has, but the SRT guys do have a lot of passion and talent. But they ain't gonna keep making our beloved viper if they don't get support from us supposed viper fans first! Have faith people, have faith......
The C7 typically puts down 117MPH traps, but that's not the scary part. The fact that the C7 has 285 size rears and beat an 08' ZR1 including it's average speed, is what's really scary.
21. Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 1:38.28 132MPH '14 461HP 22. Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 1:38.70 131MPH '08 647HP
The Z0x will be mean. Maybe even take down the TA. The ACR needs to be revolutionary in aero and HP.
Personally, at this point, I feel Viper production needs to come to a halt. I don't find the TA all that exciting if it's considered two models above the SRT and can only best the outgoing ZR1 by a few tenths. In this day and age you CANNOT do this two year planning thing for a new car. Tweaking as you go is fine and dandy but as it's been said before, the C7 is just that good of a performer. Why? Because GM takes their time to create the best bang-for-the-buck car.
By the time we hear anything about another Viper from SRT, GM will have a team designing the C8.
--RS
when the TA was released I felt that the only reason behind that car was to beat the ZR1 at Laguna. Why couldn't the GTS?
The fact that the SRT/GTS's poor showing vs its main older competitor, ZR1, continued test after test forced Ralph to have to step up the Vipers game. The fact that he had to Frankenstein a GTS with an SRT package and then some, to come up with a car that can only beat the older ZR1 by 1 tenth of a sec speaks volumes to me. The TA is not a GT car in any way shape or form as the ZR1 or the GTS is IMHO. I keep trying to see past that but just can't. The TA is an admission by SRT that the GTS can't handle the older ZR1. That is just my feeling on the matter. Love the Viper but just don't understand SRT.
What would be interesting to see is how fast a GTS would be with the carbon aero package, which is a relatively tame aero package and on par with the ZR1's. The GTS with aero may be nearly as fast as the TA, and would remain a GT car. Aero is powerful, as the ACR shows.
Two weeks ago when I was tracking my Camaro against cars with big wings and splitters, I was faster than all of the cars but the big-wing cars. The fastest car of the day was a late-model M3 with a big wing on the back, a splitter, coilovers and R compounds. The driver has been tracking for 20 years. He claims his aero shaves 3 full seconds off of his lap times at Buttonwillow, which is a much slower track than Laguna Seca. Aero would shave more time off at Seca. So aero plays a huge role.
A GTS, with the carbon aero package, and equivalent tires. It would be a much different story.
Does anyone remember the following test? It's Motortrends initial workout of the C6 ZR1 at Laguna Seca during their '09 Best Driver's Car Competition. Randy Pobst is the driver, and he makes many of the same comments about the early ZR1 that he made about the GEN V Viper during the comparo.
It just goes to show the handling of the C6 ZR1 wasn't to his liking initially either. GM honed the C6 ZR1's handling as it matured. SRT will do the same. Plus, the TA will be hitting the market soon, and hopefully the market will bare a GEN V ACR.
SRT has already improved the handling in production GTSs and SRTs, and the improvements were detailed in later Motortrend tests. Unfortunately, the damage was already done, and the ZR1 comparo went viral, and the results became gospel. I won't even mention the SLS Black Series comparo. That was an apples to oranges comparison as far as I'm concerned.
Watch the video. All I could do was smile because if you just listen to Pobst's comments his criticisms of the early production ZR1 are almost identical to the GEN V Viper. It puts the early GEN V results in perspective for me. Oh yeah! The ZR1 turned in a 1:35.8 lap time at Laguna Seca during Motortrend's original test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ObFBtVbe-ug#t=17