Yeah, I still don't like stripes.A picture speaks a thousand words...nuff said
You must be registered for see images attach
NOMERCY..
I was 11B40 in the Army, 4th Ivy Division out of FT.Carson, deployed for the Nam in Nov. of 74---not much conflict left then, but hey it only takes one bullet fired in anger to change the out look of your day.....
Joined the Navy to learn a trade, Yeah right, they stuck me on a aircraft carrier for 3 1/2 years.
Me and Mike were trying to stir up some trouble last night is all,not wanting to start a war of words, just playing.....
As far as vettes' go around here, not many like to race, so I have only raced a few that would get on it.....
Viper was born as RT10, not GTS, I like the GTS, but the SRT is much closer to the original, the one and only RT10
While I agree that the original RT/10 is the true Viper, in my experience, MOST people that know what a Viper is associate the blue with white stripe 1996 and 1997 GTS as the most recognizable Viper.I would say the majority of people recognize the RT/10 as a Viper. And a lesser number the GTS.
Viper was born as RT10, not GTS, I like the GTS, but the SRT is much closer to the original, the one and only RT10
But the GTS silhouette can be mistaken for a ... vette.
Quote:
"I am aware that the RT10 is the TRUE/ ORIGINAL Viper. I said when the general public thinks "Viper" they think GTS."
Based on what, two comments !!!
But the GTS silhouette can be mistaken for a ... vette.
URHISTRY With your 5 post count I find it very difficult that you have been voted in to speak for the entire public. Therefore what you should say is that YOU think the GTS is "the Viper." Unless you have some form of determining the public's opinion (e.g. poll, etc.) then you should not speak for them.
I for one have owner Vipers for over a decade. Of course that included RT/10 as the GTS did not exist yet. And to me the RT/10 and GTS are essentially the same with the difference being the roof and rear fascia. Not that much really, anbd certainly not enough to discount one over another. They are both Vipers.
BTW the comment about the GTS silhouette was from the Gen I/II forum, and has been posted many times over through the years. The silhouette of the GTS and the C3 is very similar.
I think the problem is that your opinion and the general public are two separate things. You can state your own opinion, but not the opinion of the general public (unless you have some basis for it). So I guess I cannot understand it either.
BTW, what is my opinion as you seem to have the ability to read minds?
But we really cannot know what the general public thinks beyond the few we interface with through time, which is a very small cross-section. I also think the majority of people have not had the experience to actually get up close to a Viper. Any Viper. There just is not that many of them and most are in their garage at any point in time.
So car guys/gals probably get most of what they see from the media (mostly magazines) and the image Viper has changed through the years. Not sure wehicj version has been on more covers or articles, but I am certain there is a time element with the GTS having more during the Gen II period and the RT/10 getting all of it during the Gen I time. So it may depend a lot on the age of the person as the Gen I high volume publicity was back in 89-95 and the GTS from 95-2000. Neither has had a lot of publicity in the last 5 years. Even the SRT has had minimal coverage since the pre-launch period, and that publicity was generally poor (fried eggs, et. al.).