MoparMan
Enthusiast
Listen to Chris. If you search on line in the right places you'll see that engineering work on the ZC is progressing.
Bob - the info's out there. The Viper will continue on to the ZC platform in another couple of MY's
I think that Chris's response on the other thread - DENIED - is correct. Not only because of the source of Chris's data but also based on the way parts are usually ordered for a new edition. The engine, tranny, clutch and GKN Visco-Lok differential are new to the '08 year. Are you telling me that Chrysler only ordered two model years of these parts after spending the money for the R&D to develop them? I don't believe it. One of you out there, perhaps someone who posts on ALLPAR, knows how many of the clutches, etc. were ordered. If so, let us know what the story is. On the other hand, the pistons in the '08 engine are the same as those used in the SRT 8 vehicles. If Chrysler is developing a VVT, 6.4 liter eight cylinder engine with 500 plus HP for use in one or more of its SRT 8 vehicles, my guess is that they could use the tranny, clutch, etc. with that engine. I would feel better if I saw some visible signs of a significant advertising budget for the Viper. So far, I have not seen same. The failure to have an '08 Viper at the Miami Beach auto show was either not a good sign or an idiotic marketing error.
C'mon Sween, that cost next to nothing. Look what MoparMan said above, the ZC Platform has been approved.Chrysler updated the magnum for 08 (new front facia, headlights etc.) Now there wont be one for 09...........
The lack of advertising is meaningless, there has been virtually no advertising for years, so there is no change in that area. Plus the car is selling like hotcakes and they have learned the lesson of overproduction...Therefore no need to advertise.
Why would they be retiring the Viper when they are contemplating the Viper for ALMS GT2 for 2009? And as someone stated earlier, why would they introduce the ACR and then cancel it a year later? I would think that in the worst case scenario that they would sell them up until the new CAFE rules simply make it impossible to sell them. But on the other hand, it will make our cars worth more. All I know is that I have mine and am looking for another one. This just means one more reason to get one soon.
And I have yet to see Matt be wrong on anything Viper yet - and usually months before most of us get any official word. Sometimes I wonder if his last name isn't really Iacocca...Listen to Chris. If you search on line in the right places you'll see that engineering work on the ZC is progressing.
1. If they stop production in 2009 then all our rt10's..GTS's..and SRT10's. Little by little become more race as people wreck them and worth more money on resale
2. If they keep making them then great..It's an awesome car..
3.If they took a few years off and reintroduced the viper with 700 HP and a brand new look..Would you be mad????
4. Yes they really could stop production in 2009 guys. The ACR is nonthing more than a kool paint job and some plastic add ons, with differant rims and a spoiler. Not a hole lot went into turning a 2008 coupe into a 2009 ACR...LOL
But man OH man wouldthe Viper being going out with a BANG if production stopps in 2009
Then try this little tidbit: The Viper is profitable. And with the money already spent for the drivetrain development they are simply printing cash as each Viper rolls into a Reliable truck.After having my own company purchased by private equity, and having dealt personally with cerberus et al., most of the info is way offbase. The only thing that matters is ROI, they are having trouble to get the rest of the notes, and they will be selling assets to bring in liquidity, as well as tapping DC for agreed financing.
Prior plans, pre-production, tooling, meetings with clubs etc. don't mean anything when you need to get the money back, and can just as well right off the losses.
I hope the viper stays, but Bill P. has an ACR order from me.
My .02
You need to do a lot more reading of the appropriate introduction threads if you think the ACR is nothing but a paint job, plastic add ons, rims and a spoiler. How does 1000 pounds of downforce sound? How about the ability to generate 1.5g's cornering?
There are factory options for power up to 675
Wish I had a dime for every time it has been rumored and for every post like this that the Viper is no more as I'd be able buy myself a new ACR.
For info on the 675hp read here: http://forums.viperclub.org/vca-mem...mopar-showcase-viper-possibilities-naias.htmlWhere is this "675Hp factory option"?
I've heard many speak of it but haven't seen part numbers or pricing.
For info on the 675hp read here: http://forums.viperclub.org/vca-mem...mopar-showcase-viper-possibilities-naias.html
Keep in mind the future 675 hp increase option is going to be from MoPar Performance, and though often stated as a factory option on forums, it has always been listed as a performance parts upgrade from Chrysler.
Then try this little tidbit: The Viper is profitable. And with the money already spent for the drivetrain development they are simply printing cash as each Viper rolls into a Reliable truck.
I am pretty sure that when it goes to the dealer it is a sold unit as far as the manufacturer goes - they get paid by the dealer. Ever heard of a dealership sending cars back to the factory for a refund? Nope! The 2008's on the showroom floors are "sold" cars as far as the factory is concerned. The dealerships are banking on making a nice profit when they sell them to the consumer, while the factory already has when they sold it to the dealership.
If the Viper were to come to an end it wouldn't be because it was losing money. It would be because people keep starting rumors that make the company look indecisive or quoting ridiculous eBay prices so they can drive the market down enough to buy one themselves.
(waits for to begin....)
I believe he said ROI, not profits. Profits on revenue determine ROI. If the ROI is not up to ***** in a certain segment, the bean counters start focusing on you and asking" why are we doing this?" and then there goes long term credit structure and insurance ratings and so forth and so on.
I mean really, if they are netting out 5-10% on investment, seems like a safer bet for the money is bond issues. Same money, less risk. On the other hand, if they are making 25% ROI, no discussion is necessary. It's a keeper unless significant risk is invloved.
If it were my investment money, would I spend it in hopes of getting the same returns they currently garner? Or would I want to spend it on something less risky with same ROI? Or would I want to spend it on something more risky with potential windfall? Would I gamble my branding?
What do you want to play in the casino? What is your risk profile? How deep are your pockets? What are your objectives?
New owner, new deal, new rules.
Thanks. I figured that you would step up. So, they will probably use the same drivetrane with the new platform and body - a lighter car - right?
C'mon Sween, that cost next to nothing. Look what MoparMan said above, the ZC Platform has been approved.