Question on Mixing fuels

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
all the wb's I have installed need the fuel type, otherwise they display the a/f incorrectly. Can you log KR on a Gen4, is it available.


[QsUOTE=Steve M;3186239]It wouldn't matter if it was narrow (0-1V) or wide (0-5V)...either will operate on the same principle.[/QUOTan'
 

VENOM V

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Posts
1,318
Reaction score
0
Location
San Jose, CA
Will they advance timing? No. Will they pull it in a big hurry? Yes. The Gen IV computers are very sensitive to anything even remotely resembling knock, and they'll adjust accordingly at the expense of power. I'd expect no less from the Gen V given they use the same engine (mostly).

Agreed, but does that happen often with a stock engine? When I was younger and worked at a service station, the government monitored and regulated fuel, inspected underground tanks, Etc. Underground tanks are checked nightly (at least where I worked) for water. So I would think getting bad gas that would pull timing would be rare. Does timing get pulled often with stock Gen IVs?
 

PeerBlock

Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Posts
460
Reaction score
0
If you are trying to increase hp one of the easiest methods is to add timing advance. Dodge has always been protective of the viper engine by pulling timing near peak torque.

You pick up anywhere from 5-10 HP for every degree of timing advance, although it can vary and there is no assurance that you will see consistent linear accumulation of power - i.e. 10 degrees of timing advance doesn't assure you will get 50-100 HP...diminishing returns and you will also be limited by the physical quantity of air being drawn into the engine.

Let's be clear about what we are doing though. By advancing timing are igniting the air:fuel mixture before the piston reaches TDC so in essence it is controlled detonation, with the idea that by igniting the fuel sooner it allows for more of it to be burnt on the power stroke. It is easy to do but it's arguably not an engine-friendly way of gaining power...that being said, the Gen V engine is built with forged pistons and other durable materials it could probably handle the increased cylinder pressures you get with aggressive timing advance.

The PCM also forces the viper engine to run extremely rich at peak rpm, this is also intended to protect the engine from detonation. The theory is that on a hot day at the track the car will not detonate.

This is a pretty common configuration on modern performance cars which is why you often see a puff of smoke shoot out the exhaust when someone is shifting near the engine's redline

The problem is that you are giving away a lot of hp. It is all too easy to add timing and pull fuel on a Gen 1, II and III and get back some of that hp. There is no MAF sensor on the viper engine it is air density control. A lot of tuning was done with both the VEC and SCT, a large part of the tuning is an increase in the timing, in general that requires a higher octane. To go one step further tremendous hp increases can be had in boosted applications, when higher octanes are used used. With my Gen II, I have both 93 octane tunes and 108 octane tunes.

Obviously with forced induction you will benefit from using higher octane fuels since you can force more air into the engine. That's the name of the game, though. The more air you can squeeze into the cylinder the more fuel can be burnt and thus the more power can be made. Advancing timing does not require that the A/F ratio is changed and technically isn't a power gain - it's more of a power recovery, in that you are recovering the power that you already had but lost due to the tuning being biased toward reliability.

On a stock Gen V for daily driving, at this point any octane over 93 is not going to result in any positive gains. For long track events on a a hot day, I would not want anything less than 93.

I can agree with this, but I'd like to note that without resorting to forced induction you are limited by the maximum amount of air that the engine can inhale with each revolution, and therefore how much of said fuel can be burnt. You could do something like run nitro and double your engine power without going to forced induction.
 

Steve M

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Posts
1,094
Reaction score
215
Location
Dayton, OH
all the wb's I have installed need the fuel type, otherwise they display the a/f incorrectly. Can you log KR on a Gen4, is it available.

Yes, you need this to display the A/F ratio based on the fuel you are running, but they still all measure in lambda. In other words, the sensor only knows lambda, and the box is doing the calculation after that measurement to display the A/F ratio based on the user's input of what they think the stoichiometric value is for whatever gas they are using. 14.7 is the value for gasoline, but you can't get straight gas from anywhere anymore...E10 is around 14.4-14.5-ish IIRC.

As for logging KR on a Gen IV, I have no idea...I have no logging software for this car. All of my previous tuning experience was on an LS1 powered Camaro using HPTuners, and they don't support Vipers.
 

Jack B

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2000
Posts
3,485
Reaction score
0
Location
NE Ohio
I also used HP Tuners on on a 2008 Solstice GXP. We still have the car , it is a shame that GM killed the brand. That ECU was a Bosch because of the direct injection. There was a lot of tuning done around logs of the KR. HPTuners was early to bring out that specific tuning package, but, very late to find the MAF limitation. I use the SCT product on my Gen II, it is Ok, but,it lacks the detail of HP Tuners. On the other hand, the Gen II PCM doesn't offer that many PID's.

Are saying that the KR is not a PID that you can see with a general OBD scan tool on the Gen IV Is anyone using a scan tool for the Gen IV.

Yes, you need this to display the A/F ratio based on the fuel you are running, but they still all measure in lambda. In other words, the sensor only knows lambda, and the box is doing the calculation after that measurement to display the A/F ratio based on the user's input of what they think the stoichiometric value is for whatever gas they are using. 14.7 is the value for gasoline, but you can't get straight gas from anywhere anymore...E10 is around 14.4-14.5-ish IIRC.

As for logging KR on a Gen IV, I have no idea...I have no logging software for this car. All of my previous tuning experience was on an LS1 powered Camaro using HPTuners, and they don't support Vipers.
 
Last edited:

Steve M

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Posts
1,094
Reaction score
215
Location
Dayton, OH
I just don't even have a generic OBD scan tool, so I have no idea what is possible to scan with a Gen IV.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,647
Posts
1,685,251
Members
18,224
Latest member
dave777
Top