Roe TT

ROCKET62

Has Left the Room!
Joined
Mar 6, 2003
Posts
2,392
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ bye-bye IOWA
Interesting - a couple two/three thousand more than a Paxton for the entry level systems. Similar horsepower and in theory, easier on the motor. Weight about similar ?? - although less weight up front. Heat more of a concern - can't tell if Sean used the stock exhaust manifolds and if he uses any cats? Could not see exactly where Sean grabs/returns the oil as those turbos are mounted pretty low. Would like to see what the fuel system mods involve as that aspect of the Paxton has always bothered me. Definitely have me thinking.
 

pea_jay

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Posts
19
Reaction score
0
Very interested, please keep us informed! What would be the max boost on the stock bottom end? 8psi or close? I know ive seen paxton cars near 700whp and i figured since turbos are way less stress, the same power could be had with less stress on the bottom end
 

spmorgan

Viper Owner
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Posts
47
Reaction score
0
Location
Tampa, FL
I'm just curious why turbos are less stress then superchargers? What is the science there?
 

Shandon

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Posts
1,450
Reaction score
0
Location
Northern Kentucky
I'm just curious why turbos are less stress then superchargers? What is the science there?


My understanding is that since they don't run off the belts up front to spin up there is less stress. Im sure some greater mind than me will jump in though.:eater:
 

Joseph Dell

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
3,463
Reaction score
0
Location
Atlanta, GA 30338
My understanding is that since they don't run off the belts up front to spin up there is less stress. Im sure some greater mind than me will jump in though.:eater:
+1. A paxton takes 100-150 flywheel horsepower to spin the supercharger itself. 80-120 (appx) for a ROE). Turbos generate heat and the needs external oil lubrication whereas supercharges (some) need external lubrication. ROE doesn't.

just some fun facts!
 

ROCKET62

Has Left the Room!
Joined
Mar 6, 2003
Posts
2,392
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix, AZ bye-bye IOWA
I'm just curious why turbos are less stress then superchargers? What is the science there?

From Superchargersonline.com:

[FONT=Arial, verdana]FEATURES :: SUPERCHARGER TECH[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]Turbo vs. Supercharger[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]4/3/2002 11:31:00 PM[/FONT]


[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's one of the most common questions we are asked - the answer to which is almost impossible to find[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"What is better - a supercharger or a turbo?"[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]We only wish the answer were that simple, but unfortunately it is not. The simple answer is:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"It depends."[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]But don't worry, we'll go into more depth than that here. Both superchargers and turbos have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Selecting the right kind of forced induction for your vehicle will depend upon your particular vehicle, your driving habits, your power preferences, and your needs.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Clearing Up Confusion[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]According to Merriam-Webster's dictionary, a supercharger is defined as:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"a device (as a blower or compressor) for pressurizing the cabin of an airplane or for increasing the volume air charge of an internal combustion engine over that which would normally be drawn in through the pumping action of the pistons".[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A turbocharger is defined as:[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"a centrifugal blower driven by exhaust gas turbines and used to supercharge an engine".[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]According to Webster's, a turbocharger is included in the definition for superchargers - it is in fact a very specific type of supercharger - one that is driven by exhaust gasses. Other superchargers that do not fall into this category - the kind that we are all used to hearing about - are normally driven directly from the engine's crankshaft via a crank pulley. So in reality, it is not fair to compare all superchargers to turbochargers, because all turbochargers are also superchargers. For the purpose of this discussion, however, a supercharger will be considered all superchargers that are are not driven directly by the engine, while turbochargers will be considered all superchargers that are driven by engine exhaust gasses.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Similarities[/FONT]

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Both superchargers and turbochargers are forced induction systems and thus have the same objective - to compress air and force more air molecules into the engine's combustion chambers than would normally be allowed at atmospheric pressure here on Earth (14.7 psi at sea level). The benefit of forcing more air molecules into the combustion chambers is that it allows your engine to burn more fuel per power stroke. With an internal combustion engine, burning more fuel means that you convert more fuel into energy and power. For this reason, supercharged and turbocharged engines normally produce 40% to 100%+ more power (depending on the amount of boost - check out our horespower calculator) than normally aspirated engines.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]How They Work[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A supercharger is mounted to the engine and is driven by a pulley that is inline with the crank (or accessory) belt. Air is drawn into the supercharger and compressed by either an impeller (centrifugal-style supercharger), twin rotating screws (screw-type supercharger), or counter-rotating rotors (roots-type supercharger). The air is then discharged into the engine's intake. Faster crank speed (more engine rpm) spins the supercharger faster and allows the supercharger to produce more boost (normally 6 to 9 psi for a street vehicle). Typical peak operating speeds for a supercharger are around 15,000 rpm (screw-type and roots style superchargers) and 40,000 rpm (centrifugal-style superchargers).[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A turbocharger operates in much the same way as a centrifugal (internal impeller) supercharger, except it is not driven by pulleys and belts attached to the engine's crank. A turbo is instead driven by exhaust gasses that have been expelled by the engine and are travelling through the exhaust manifold. The exhaust gas flows through one half of the turbocharger's turbine, which drives the impeller that compresses the air. Typical operating speeds of a turbocharger are between 75,000 and 150,000 rpm.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Head to Head Comparison[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Now it's time to evaluate the turbocharger versus the supercharger according to several important factors.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Cost[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The cost of supercharger and a turbocharger systems for the same engine are approximately the same, so cost is generally not a factor.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Lag[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]This is perhaps the biggest advantage that the supercharger enjoys over the tubo. Because a turbocharger is driven by exhaust gasses, the turbocharger's turbine must first spool up before it even begins to turn the compressor's impeller. This results in lag time which is the time needed for the turbine to reach its full throttle from an intermediate rotational speed state. During this lag time, the turbocharger is creating little to no boost, which means little to no power gains during this time. Smaller turbos spool up quicker, which eliminates some of this lag. Turbochargers thus utilize a wastegate, which allows the use of a smaller turbocharger to reduce lag while preventing it from spinning too quickly at high engine speeds. The wastegate is a valve that allows the exhaust to bypass the turbine blades. The wastegate senses boost pressure, and if it gets too high, it could be an indicator that the turbine is spinning too quickly, so the wastegate bypasses some of the exhaust around the turbine blades, allowing the blades to slow down.. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]A Supercharger, on the other hand, is connected directly to the crank, so there is no "lag". Superchargers are able to produce boost at a very low rpm, especially screw-type and roots type blowers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Efficiency[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]This is the turbo's biggest advantage. The turbocharger is generally more economical to operate as it as it is driven primarily by potential energy in the exhaust gasses that would otherwise be lost out the exhaust, whereas a supercharger draws power from the crank, which can be used to turn the wheels. The turbocharger's impeller is also powered only under boost conditions, so there is less parasitic drag while the impeller is not spinning. The turbocharger, however, is not free of inefficiency as it does create additional exhaust backpressure and exhaust flow interruption. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Heat[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Because the turbocharger is mounted to the exhaust manifold (which is very hot), turbocharger boost is subject to additional heating via the turbo's hot casing. Because hot air expands (the opposite goal of a turbo or supercharger), an intercooler becomes necessary on almost all turbocharged applications to cool the air charge before it is released into the engine. This increases the complexity of the installation. A centrifugal supercharger on the other hand creates a cooler air discharge, so an intercooler is often not necessary at boost levels below 10psi. That said, some superchargers (especially roots-type superchargers) create hotter discharge temperatures, which also make an intecooler necessary even on fairly low-boost applications.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Surge[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Because a turbocharger first spools up before the boost is delivered to the engine, there is a surge of power that is delivered immediately when the wastegate opens (around 3000 rpm). This surge can be damaging to the engine and drivetrain, and can make the vehicle difficult to drive or lose traction. [/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Back Pressure[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Because the supercharger eliminates the need to deal with the exhaust gas interruption created by inserting a turbocharger turbine into the exhaust flow, the supercharger creates no additional exhaust backpressure. The amount of power that is lost by a turbo's turbine reduces it's overall efficiency.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Noise[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]The turbocharger is generally quiter than the supercharger. Because the turbo's turbine is in the exhaust, the turbo can substantially reduce exhaust noise, making the engine run quieter. Some centrifugal superchargers are known to be noisy and whistley which, annoys some drivers (we, however, love it!)[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Reliability[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]In general, superchargers enjoy a substantial reliability advantage over the turbocharger. When a a turbo is shut off (i.e. when the engine is turned off), residual oil inside the turbo's bearings can be baked by stored engine heat. This, combined with the turbo's extremely high rpms (up to 150,000rpm) can cause problems with the turbo's internal bearings and can shorten the life of the turbocharger. In addition, many turbos require aftermarket exhaust manifolds, which are often far less reliable than stock manifolds.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Ease of Installation[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Superchargers are substantially easier to install than a turbos because they have far fewer components and simpler devices. Turbos are complex and require manifold and exhaust modifications, intercoolers, extra oil lines, etc. - most of which is not needed with most superchargers. A novice home mechanic can easily install most supercharger systems, while a turbo installation should be left to a turbo expert.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Maximum Power Output[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Turbos are known for their unique ability to spin to incredibly high rpms and make outrages peak boost figures (25psi+). While operating a turbocharger at very high levels of boost requires major modifications to the rest of the engine, the turbo is capable of producing more peak power than superchargers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Tunability[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Turbochargers, because they are so complex and rely on exhaust pressure, are notoriously difficult to tune. Superchargers, on the other hand, require few fuel and ignition upgrades and normally require little or no engine tuning.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Conclusion[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]While the supercharger is generally considered to be a better method of forced induction for most street and race vehicles, the turbo will always have its place in a more specialized market. Superchargers generally provide a much broader powerband that most drivers are looking for with no "turbo lag". In addition, they are much easier to install and tune, making them more practical for a home or novice mechanic.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]We hope you have found this discussion informative and unbiased. Sometimes when we explain this to our customers, they say that we are biased towards superchargers because that is all we carry. We remind those customers that a turbo is a kind of supercharger and that we truly hope to carry turbochargers someday. The reason we do not currently sell any turbochargers is because we have not yet found a turbo system that is suitable for mail-order / e-commerce sale. We are not prepared to sell a turbo system that is difficult to install and requires the attention of a professional engine tuner or mechanic. If any turbocharger manufacturer makes such a system, please send us the details as we would love to carry such a product.[/FONT]
 

1TONY1

Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 19, 2001
Posts
5,661
Reaction score
0
Location
Dalton Ga. (Chatt. Tn.)
From Superchargersonline.com:

[FONT=Arial, verdana]FEATURES :: SUPERCHARGER TECH[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]Turbo vs. Supercharger[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]4/3/2002 11:31:00 PM[/FONT]

I read through that and thought it was biased towards s/c's and went back to see where the article originated :D
 

00SVTdubs

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Posts
644
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Collins, CO
-

- Stage 3: Same as 2, but with a complete fuel system upgrade to
support 1,300 crank HP (the rating of these turbos). Cost $14,900 with
installation for now. You would need billet main bearing caps at this HP
level.


:usa:

So if one came in with a built motor already in the car, this would be just under 15k installed, tuned, out the door? Thats amazing!
 

Nader

Enthusiast
Joined
May 20, 2005
Posts
3,386
Reaction score
0
Location
New York
I am a bit lost... If it takes upwards of 100-150 hp to spin the blower how are the paxton cars putting down almost 700hp? Would that mean the paxtons cars are really making 800 to 850hp?



+1. A paxton takes 100-150 flywheel horsepower to spin the supercharger itself. 80-120 (appx) for a ROE). Turbos generate heat and the needs external oil lubrication whereas supercharges (some) need external lubrication. ROE doesn't.

just some fun facts!
 

00SVTdubs

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Posts
644
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort Collins, CO
I am a bit lost... If it takes upwards of 100-150 hp to spin the blower how are the paxton cars putting down almost 700hp? Would that mean the paxtons cars are really making 800 to 850hp?

no, they are making 700hp because 150hp is LOST in having the motor turn the blower instead of the turbos
 

Darbgnik

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Posts
878
Reaction score
0
Location
Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
I am a bit lost... If it takes upwards of 100-150 hp to spin the blower how are the paxton cars putting down almost 700hp? Would that mean the paxtons cars are really making 800 to 850hp?

Basically, the motor may make 800 horses in and of itself, but will never be realized at the rear tire, as 100 or so is being eaten up at the crank by the blower.

Takes horses to make horses with a blower, thats why turbos are considered more efficient, or so I've read.:dunno:
 

Aelmin

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Posts
10
Reaction score
0
- Stage 1 kit: twin turbo system just like what's on the yellow
car, but without electronic boost control (Garret / Precision 62mm with
billet impeller, TiAL wastegates and blow off valves, Precision turbo
intercooler, SCT, 69 lb/hr injectors, fuel system upgrade, etc). Boost would
be set at 6 psi (for example) on a stock engine. That should yield about
620 RWHP. Cost $12,900 including installation for now.

What about the parts sold as a kit? I like to turn my own wrenches :D
 

Twister

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Posts
3,140
Reaction score
1
Based on whats being posted...This is gonna be a reality very soon..

Gotta admit..For only 13K the basic set up is somthing I will look into...

A bolt on SRT10 with 490 rwhp plus the basic 6 psi kit will be good for 650 PLUS rwhp...

Not to take anything away from the paxton as most 650 rwhp paxton srt10's trapp around 128-132 mph...

But I suspect a 650 rwhp TT srt10 will trapp more around 133-137 mph..

TT cars always seem to out perform SC cars rwhp vs rwhp..


Seems very good so far sean
 

RobZilla

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Posts
1,588
Reaction score
0
Location
Jacksonville, FL USA
I think I can speak for Sean to answer the update question.

The car featured in the youtube video has been delivered back to the owner. Sean is currently working on another car and this time plans to build two kits thus have one as a base model for future builds.

Anyone with serious inquiries should contact him directly at [email protected]

:usa:
 

RTTTTed

Viper Owner
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
6,438
Reaction score
1
I'm glad it's getting closer to being available.

I think I'll keep my Roe supercharger and Nitrous for the time being however.

Now, if the TT kits are more driveable and get better gas mileage than my car, I'd have a great reason for changing over. In my case I love the huge torque at 1200rpm in 6th gear while driving down the highway andthe TT couldn't give me that. Now, for my next Viper ... have to inquire as to Gen 2 availablility.

Congrats Sean.
 

JAY

Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Posts
1,425
Reaction score
0
Location
Ontario Canada
Glad to hear there are more options for Gen 3 Viper ! Great work Sean ,looking forward to the final product for purchase. :2tu: :)
 

RobZilla

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Posts
1,588
Reaction score
0
Location
Jacksonville, FL USA
The info that was passed to me is that the car came from Germany. I believe I saw a VCA sticker on it, but who knows if he/she is active.

:usa:
 

plumcrazy

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Posts
16,243
Reaction score
7
Location
ALL OVER
this thread was started on oct 30th and we still have not heard a word from sean himself....
 

Bobpantax

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 2, 2000
Posts
6,957
Reaction score
3
Location
Miami
How about Sean posting hard facts concerning the details of what is, or is not, available as of now. The Gen III supercharger story rose and fell more than once. Now we have a turbo story. What is really happening here? Custom, one off applications or a warranted, reliable kit or both?
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
153,645
Posts
1,685,215
Members
18,221
Latest member
tractor1996
Top