Alan,
I finally fathomed out the Part 1 and 2 average point calculations you referred to.
I'm surprised that such a complicated average points system is used. It's basically a hybrid average/total points system! It is not too different from a simple (Average Points) x (Events Attended.)
Another system might be a Formula One approach. Someone like Pemberton could hang in there with 2 wins in 2 events because this system is heavily biased towards winning the race. (F1 awards 10, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1 pts for 1st thru 6th place. So a win is worth 10 6th place finishes!)
Bad thing with this is with all the Super Stock cars, so many people would have 0 points!
I just looked up SCCA points standings and it looks like they might use something like F1 because the points went from something like 60 to 0 in one particular class.
But whatever the rules are, they apply to everyone, and in that regard things are not too bad.
However, after thinking about this for a while, there is one thing that is not addressed in the rules and that is trailered versus driven cars. The trailered cars have a tremendous advantage over driven cars because they don't have to worry about saving the car to get them home.
I think this could be address because some of the smallest modifications are assessed points. What would a trailer be worth? 1, 2, or 5 points?
I am really looking forward to Watkins Glen - I hear it is a great track. Although my Heart belongs to Sebring!