>I personally think car designers don't have pre-oiling systems because they don't want your car to last forever. Cranking a cold engine causes more wear & tear in seconds than driving it for years when it's been well lubricated. <
No.
First of all, it is literally not true. Heavy duty OEMs like Cat, Detroit Diesel, Mack, Cummins all do want their engine to last as long as they can before overhaul, since that is a key economic decision for customers. Second, an engine cannot be "well lubricated" while driving and then somehow be left unprotected during cranking. Third, the additives in the oil that comprise from 8% to 18% of that quart are surface active and do not "drain" into the oil pan, no matter how long you let the engine sit. Fourth, and I can see the notion is in this thread, you have to separate "cranking" from "racing". Oiling during 100 RPM and no load is different that 5000 RPM under high load. Not to endorse those crazy commercials that show engines running without oil, but the reason they can is there is no load!
If that statement were remotely true, then Viper engines would only last half as long as others. Because of the odd-fire 10 cylinder, the ECU has to crank at least one revolution to find TDC, which is far longer than an even fire 4, 6, or 8 cylinder. That extra cranking would mean extra wear and shorter life relative to the other engines?
While at Texaco we participated in the testing to revise the low temperature engine oil requirements - the "W" rating. We had a Toyota engine on a dyno in a cold room which could go down to -40C. The program had a long series of oils and measured the time it took for oil pressure to reach various parts of the engine. An oil was a failure if it didn't show oil pressure after 2 minutes or so. During its life the engine cranked as much as it ran. At the end of the program, people couldn't wait to snap it up and put it back in the Camry it came from and drive off with a cheap, new car.