I can tell you that the last I heard....10.7X @ 133.
Not saying that the number can't be achieved, but just seems odd that it was a .22 (3 hun better than my man GB3) and 138 trap (also a factor of 3 better than the GB3 run of 135 and change).
When I see it, I will believe it. As was previously stated, the mention was made by an independent party...drawing conclusions from some website information that has since been modified to include a disclaimer regarding optimum numbers and the environment.
Those in the know can draw their own conclusions....the way
I see it, GB3 is still the man on motor....but we aren't far behind you brother.
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time....but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Words to live by on this board.