Serious Eric
Enthusiast
... And LOSE 20 hp!
Went to a dyno day at Auto-Tek with Dave Weaver (Viper tech/guru) and the central Tx club. Made two pulls on their Dyno-Jet; First with stock airbox (front baffle removed), smoothies and dirty K&Ns -> 426 peak SAE Hp, 463 ft.lb torque. Second pull we yanked the airbox and let it breathe through the open smoothies -> 406 peak SAE Hp. The losses were same THROUGHOUT the rpm range!
Only thing I can attribute this to would be intake air temp. With the airbox removed, the smoothies (and cones if you had 'em) were drawing air from right behind the radiator.
I think that in a real-world situation the difference would be even greater. On the dyno, the hood was up 8" at the front (both pulls) which should tend to reduce the difference between ambient intake temp and underhood air temp.
BTW - ambient conditions were 89 deg F, 58% humidity, don't remember barometric pressure. Fan blowing air onto front of car. Thanks to all concerned for a great Dyno-day. Can't put my finger on it, but I think the numbers from that machine were a bit low. I know my car has pulled 449 Hp in the same trim and almost everybody else who had dynoed before saw similarly reduced numbers ... well that's chassis dynos for ya.
Went to a dyno day at Auto-Tek with Dave Weaver (Viper tech/guru) and the central Tx club. Made two pulls on their Dyno-Jet; First with stock airbox (front baffle removed), smoothies and dirty K&Ns -> 426 peak SAE Hp, 463 ft.lb torque. Second pull we yanked the airbox and let it breathe through the open smoothies -> 406 peak SAE Hp. The losses were same THROUGHOUT the rpm range!
Only thing I can attribute this to would be intake air temp. With the airbox removed, the smoothies (and cones if you had 'em) were drawing air from right behind the radiator.
I think that in a real-world situation the difference would be even greater. On the dyno, the hood was up 8" at the front (both pulls) which should tend to reduce the difference between ambient intake temp and underhood air temp.
BTW - ambient conditions were 89 deg F, 58% humidity, don't remember barometric pressure. Fan blowing air onto front of car. Thanks to all concerned for a great Dyno-day. Can't put my finger on it, but I think the numbers from that machine were a bit low. I know my car has pulled 449 Hp in the same trim and almost everybody else who had dynoed before saw similarly reduced numbers ... well that's chassis dynos for ya.