Torquemonster
Enthusiast
Here's a question for the road racers out there - cause what I thought I knew, I'm no longer sure...
...of course we all know what Thought thought. He thought he had a car, but he only had a horn.
Anyway... There have ever been 2 schools of thought - one school = stiff spring rates and shocks and modest sway bars for best handling. These cars handle flat and good at high speed, but are bone jarring on the road, cause long term rattles etc, and do not handle well on bumpy roads - they skip and judder.
The second school uses softer spring rates and big sway bars - for acceptable ride, good tire contact over lower speed bumps, and keeps the car very flat.
I've always been of the opinion that a good road car that also sees some track duty must have a compliant suspension.... as in progressive spring rates for maximum compliance over slow dips and bumps etc, and progressively stiffer as suspension is forced to work harder at speed AND stiff anti-sway bars. The reason was that stiff anti-roll bars allow a good basic ride and plenty of suspension compliance to keep the wheel on the road while controlling roll - keeping the car nice and flat.... (as a side they work well in drag cars too and guys who take them off are nuts - we used them to run 6 seconds!).
The new SRT10 has gone for stiff spring rates that obviously work very well on a track or smooth road - who can argue with over 1g - that is better than the Euro supercars manage. However, it will limit the car over secondary paved roads and bumpy race tracks.
So which is better - progressive rates and strong anti-sway for maximum suspension compliance OR stiff rates and maximum grip at speed on smooth surfaces and the trade off they make a low speeds and comfort?
...of course we all know what Thought thought. He thought he had a car, but he only had a horn.
Anyway... There have ever been 2 schools of thought - one school = stiff spring rates and shocks and modest sway bars for best handling. These cars handle flat and good at high speed, but are bone jarring on the road, cause long term rattles etc, and do not handle well on bumpy roads - they skip and judder.
The second school uses softer spring rates and big sway bars - for acceptable ride, good tire contact over lower speed bumps, and keeps the car very flat.
I've always been of the opinion that a good road car that also sees some track duty must have a compliant suspension.... as in progressive spring rates for maximum compliance over slow dips and bumps etc, and progressively stiffer as suspension is forced to work harder at speed AND stiff anti-sway bars. The reason was that stiff anti-roll bars allow a good basic ride and plenty of suspension compliance to keep the wheel on the road while controlling roll - keeping the car nice and flat.... (as a side they work well in drag cars too and guys who take them off are nuts - we used them to run 6 seconds!).
The new SRT10 has gone for stiff spring rates that obviously work very well on a track or smooth road - who can argue with over 1g - that is better than the Euro supercars manage. However, it will limit the car over secondary paved roads and bumpy race tracks.
So which is better - progressive rates and strong anti-sway for maximum suspension compliance OR stiff rates and maximum grip at speed on smooth surfaces and the trade off they make a low speeds and comfort?