1. " just adding a paxton will not make your '06 comparable - except for engine power - with questionable reliability - as compared to the normally aspirated '08." I have had a stock Paxton application on my 2006 coupe since I received the car from Woodhouse on May 11/2006. I now have a bit over 9000 miles on the car. It has been completely reliable in all contexts - traffic, highway, 100MPH plus ( in a safe an lawful environment) and at all temperature ranges. It remains to be seen whether the 2008 with VVT, cam within a cam, and complex Venom programming equals the relaiability I have experienced with my Woodhouse modified and prepared 2006 Coupe. I should add for clarification purposes that my car was inspected by Herb Helbig at CAAP and autographed on the plenum and the owner's manual was autographed by Mr. Sjoberg, father of the Viper. So, maybe I rceived an exceptional snake.
2. Whether the Viper continues depends, in part, on whether SRT continues as it has previously been formulated. Something must be happening because the Viper has not been at all auto shows and I have not yet seen any ads for the Viper in the print media. This does not mean that the Viper is being abandoned. I am merely suggesting that something must be happening internally with respect to SRT marketing and, perhaps, SRT itself.
3. With respect to the next generation, ZC, Viper, until new contracts are given to vendors for parts, it could be called off at a minimal cost in the overall corporate scheme of things. Let's face it. The entire cost of the Viper is a pimple on an elephant's tuchus from Chrysler LLC's point of view. Once again, I know nothing that would lead me to believe a cancellation is in the works.