I agree. Same exhaust/header and tire setup between a roe/Paxton/NA. Same power numbers, no excuses, etc. This will be very interesting.to stop this madness of paxton/roe/NA we really need to get a few similiar power cars to run on the street and do some pulls.
that will end it
I was just about to post that, lol.to stop this madness of paxton/roe/NA we really need to get a few similiar power cars to run on the street and do some pulls.
that will end it
NOOOO!! I think the Paxtons are a great addition to the Vipers. What I am emphasizing is that there is a misconception that when someone says they have a 700 rwhp car, many think they have a car w/ almost 200 more rwhp than a stock car all across the power band. If you combine a poor driver w/ the pros and cons of a Paxton or Twin Turbo for that matter, oine can have disappointing results as some in this forum has indicated.Your worrying too much man.
So first, you can get our cars for 60k, and a Paxton Should only be about $10-12K installed. Im buying mine for $6500, 1k for DLM stuff around $500 to dyno tune and ILLSMOQ is instlling for a fair price. And no kid in a Mustang will keep up.
Second, you keep worrying anout the weight of Paxton. Say its 70-90lbs..., so when ILLSMOQ had 15 more rwhp then me he would slightly,slightly pull me, thru a few gears he would be a half car or so.Just slowly inching ahead, but we both knew he was winning. Well, one day he had his 200lb cousin in car and was gonna show off, well i slowly edged him, ever so slighlty. So to turn the tables on his 15rwhp, I needed him to have 200lbs.
Then that brings the whole debate of how the Z06 is faster mostly due to 200 lbs lighter,yet its usually still a drivers race.
So when you have maybe 70lbs extra for a Paxton. BIG DEAL!!!!! ILLSMOQ actually already made up for that by changing to HRE's ,so he lost weight with wheels/tires. So maybe he carries around 50 extra lbs or less, but now has 200 more rwhp. That graph he posted on other thread was without tuning and belt slippage.So his power is alot more across the board. And it builds power so quickly that every second its going from 60,80,120,150, 200 rwhp more. Thats why the video outcome i posted is the way it is. He demolishes my 508 rwhp car.
Sounds like your trying to talk yourself out of it.
I think Paxtons are great. My dilemma now is I have been offered a 1000 rwhp set up at a very competitive price....but, do I or can I use 1000 rwhp????
NOOOO!! I think the Paxtons are a great addition to the Vipers. What I am emphasizing is that there is a misconception that when someone says they have a 700 rwhp car, many think they have a car w/ almost 200 more rwhp than a stock car all across the power band. If you combine a poor driver w/ the pros and cons of a Paxton or Twin Turbo for that matter, oine can have disappointing results as some in this forum has indicated.
I think Paxtons are great. My dilemma now is I have been offered a 1000 rwhp set up at a very competitive price....but, do I or can I use 1000 rwhp????
This continues to be my dilemma...I really want a car that is streetable, but also very fast. I was really planning to do what MikeR and Illsmoq had done...until this offer came about. Personally I have always felt anything over 850 rwhp was overkill for kicking ass under 150 mph, and useless in stop light to stop light racing (although I would never do that ). But guys w/ this kind of power in this forum swear that not only is the power usable and controllable, but TT guys swear once u experience TT you will never even consider a Paxton. Just when I had my mind made up and was ready to schedule the Paxton install...here comes another wrinkle. In another post I penned back in June this year, I asked should I go w/ a 900 rwhp Paxton or TT. One guy w/ a 900 rwhp Paxton dusted 3 TT set ups at Bradenton b/c the TT guys could not hook up. I really like how the Paxton power comes on later in the power band and I like its simplicity. But some guys I really admire tell me the TT is in a totally different league and I should not even consider a Paxton.....A well built 1000 rwhp Viper motor sounds fine but haven't seen much mentioned on other great mods such as Motons, Quaife, PS2's, etc. to really put all that power down. Maybe I missed a post but adding a few of these goodies would sure make for a more all around bad ****. Great project nonetheless should you move forward. Oh, what's your primary goal for this beast anyway - streat, road course, strip?
Hey guys... I think one thing everybody is forgetting is heat soak........
I don't care if you have a tt or sc... If these cars aren't cool... They perform pretty badly...
I definitely think 600-800rwhp is the best for street setups....
It would be nice to drive my car... Its in the shop...
I have had nothing but problems with the paxton setup and the tuners sooo far...
I guess we will see..
Joe
Hey Mike, when are you putting a Paxton on yours?
to stop this madness of paxton/roe/NA we really need to get a few similiar power cars to run on the street and do some pulls.
that will end it
Significantly more power when and where in the power band? Later...meaning that a less powerful Roe is more formidable in the 1/4 mile and most road races than the Paxton.I'm not sure a Roe vs. Paxton comparison is fair if you're limiting the comparison to cars with similar power levels. The problem is that the Paxton will make significantly more peak power than the Roe, and that's its advantage.
S.
so says keith....lets get a real world test going and then decide.
cause i still say its bunk. you race and shift at those higher rpm's where the paxton shines. at least on the street.
hp peaks much earlier, then slightly falls off before the shift point,
i did a bit of searching and found a couple of roe/paxton dyno sheets....can anyone overlay them to see the comparison ?
PM me with your email addy