v10enomous
Enthusiast
Meanwhile I will enjoy my new 4 door sedan coming in January that is as fast or faster than the new Gen V.
Alright... I'll bite
Meanwhile I will enjoy my new 4 door sedan coming in January that is as fast or faster than the new Gen V.
The car I am referring to is cheaper than the Gen V. It is an AMG CLS63 tuned with downpipes. It has been tested and proven to be under low 11s and even in the high 10s. Fully warrantied and can seat 4 peoples in comfort for about $110K.
Meh. I love AMG but to me it's just another Mercedes on the road. Looks more like a chicks' car but whatever floats your boat.
I agree it does not look as manly as the snake but I think you are pushing it calling it a chicks car. It roars stock as loud as a Viper and does power slides like any real sports cars.
I agree it does not look as manly as the snake but I think you are pushing it calling it a chicks car. It roars stock as loud as a Viper and does power slides like any real sports cars.
I know I would peak some interest . Far for me to think this four door sedan would beat the Viper on a track. The snake is king there . I am just talking on the streets and straight line performance. As previously stated, the Viper I would buy would be my daily driver and would rarely see the track (only a few events a year). I love driving cars and do not have the means to have a garage week end queen like the Snake.
The car I am referring to is cheaper than the Gen V. It is an AMG CLS63 tuned with downpipes. It has been tested and proven to be under low 11s and even in the high 10s. Fully warrantied and can seat 4 peoples in comfort for about $110K.
AMG CLS63 with all the options and performance packages more like 150k and at 4,500 pounds will have a hard time beating a gen 2 Viper in a straight line.
but 11.3 seconds 1/4 mile on street tires will beat most Gen 2s.
Impressive, being able to beat a 16 year old car...
Maybe he is thinking about the old CLS body style. I bought a 2013 CLS63 for my DD and I love it!!! The new body style gets many positive comments.
I know I would peak some interest . Far for me to think this four door sedan would beat the Viper on a track. The snake is king there . I am just talking on the streets and straight line performance. As previously stated, the Viper I would buy would be my daily driver and would rarely see the track (only a few events a year). I love driving cars and do not have the means to have a garage week end queen like the Snake.
The car I am referring to is cheaper than the Gen V. It is an AMG CLS63 tuned with downpipes. It has been tested and proven to be under low 11s and even in the high 10s. Fully warrantied and can seat 4 peoples in comfort for about $110K.
LMAO. Though I'd like to line up with it and see what happens. I don't see how the CLS63 and the Viper are in the same category. I think the AMG's are to be respected but compared to the Viper, the CLS63 is an overly-expensive, overly engineered, heavier, 4 door sedan, common and no wow factor. If the wow factor is being able to beat a 16 year old Viper....k....but the CLS63 and the Viper are apples-oranges. They look nice I agree with that.
Perhaps stating it's a chick's car was the wrong choice of words because chick's can fling cars around a track too. It's pretty and sleek. The word that's more appropriate is that the CLS63 is "Docile"compared to the Viper, any Viper. The Viper is unique and the Mercedes is not, anymore. I'm certain the CLS63 is a fun regardless.
Just recently got rid of an E63 and it was by far my favorite 4 door sedan i have ever owned. Will probably get another one some day. The CLS didnt have enough head room for me. This being said i can give my opinion . The E63 was blazingly fast for a sedan but my Gen IV would definitely take it in a straight line. I imagine the Gen V would be that much faster. I also think the CLS is a bit heavier than the E63. i could be wrong. Anyway, why are we even comparing a sedan toa 2 door sports car??
Those Gen IV ACRs are still available for a reason: nobody's buying them.
Good post but I disagree on this point.
There are only a handful of them around and they are in shall we kindly say "less desirable" color schemes?
To be honest, Tomball made some real questionable color schemes up. I know, I bought one.
Of course, with the Gen 5 coming out they are an even harder sell.
Great point, Jon. I should modify that to include the <3000 mile "princess" Gen IV ACRs that can be purchased for $10k or $20k less. There are a couple of gorgeous examples (SSGs and Graphites) available... I'm frankly kinda surprised that they haven't sold!
Rich
I cannot possible imagine a better deal than picking up a still under warranty 2009-2010 Gen 4 ACR with some <4-5K on it for mid 80Ks or so.
Anyway, why are we even comparing a sedan toa 2 door sports car??
Most Viper owners buy their cars for the driving experience. Cannot compare forced induction cars with their boost turned up to driving a naturally aspirated, manual transmission car. The difference in the experience is from two different worlds.
This is why the Nissan car, while putting down some pretty respectful numbers, is not on the radar screen for Viper owners. They do not wish to deal with the turbo lag, and the automatic transmission.
Doing a 1/4 mile run in a Viper is a totally different experience than driving an automatic transmission car down the track. It is more engaging and satisfying to be in control of the experience, than letting the car and computer do all the driving, with you just holding the steering wheel straight.
Mercedes makes some pretty high performing cars and trucks, but they only compare in magazine numbers, not in the experience.
In a Mercedes, everybody gets the same numbers. Skill and experience has no value. Your grandmother, girlfriend and you all get the exact same numbers going down the track. You are just along for the ride. Not Viper style.
I'm trying to figure that one out. This thread went from a concern over potential flood of used Viper going to market over the GenV, to someone getting offended by the word Supercar to a 4 door sedan that beats a 16 year old Viper and the GenV.... even though no performance numbers and/or real-world testing has been released on the GenV yet. So, what I've learned from this thread so far is:
[ ] Nothing
[X] Less than Nothing
I am not offended at all, just sharing my opinions. I simply do not have an undivided love for the Viper and respect other manufacturers for a product that is both exciting with performance to back it up.
Bring your new Gen V to a strip, post your numbers and see how close you get to 11.2 on street tires...